Guest speakers – Kaori Lau & Neesha B.

As they were introducing themselves, they also described themselves and where they were as imaged (verbal for visually impaired… or distract-ually impaired). Then talked about backgrounds and how that connected to where they were and why they were there, emphasizing on decolonizing and how education commonly harms Indigenous communities. (though can be used for assimilation or rejuvenation, depending strongly on intention).

Slips were handed out before class started, then in the presentation we were told:

  • Blue; leave at second half
  • Yellow; stay for whole
  • Green; leave for whole thing

This was to demonstrate discrimination; We all had no clue what was happening or why. Disabled students often are excluded often out of good intentions; not putting effort into understanding, consent is also key.

Who are you (in small groups for 3min discuss, then share)

  • Share an important personal identity.
  • How does it impact your day to day experiences in the world?
  • Does it connect to your interest in teaching?

(Identities brought up: double standards for women in life/education, sports, pet owner, religion/faith, culture/ethnicity, family make up, etc).

Intersectionality, in social theory, the interaction and cumulative effects of multiple forms of discrimination affecting the daily lives of individuals, particularly women of color. The term also refers more broadly to an intellectual framework for understanding how various aspects of individual identity—including race, gender, social class, and sexuality—interact to create unique experiences of privilege or oppression.

Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color on JSTOR

Intersectional Identities (Kimberlé Crenshaw); not defined by one identity – Discrimination can come in many ways and identities can be hidden or not shared (Invisible Backpack). Teachers have huge impact on these kiddos lives, often seeing teachers more than their family. Who is being represented, who is representing the group – are students relating/represented in the teacher/environment.

A classification system loosely based on their specific needs, however, funding does not always following he student who triggered support. To qualify for designations and funding there need to be an assessment; but this assessment usually takes an incredibly long time, especially due to the limited resources. This acts like triage and/or rationing which creates barriers as they can only give out a few. Thus resulting in many students not getting the help they need when they need; the practice of waiting to see but that is unhelpful for the student, even causing harm in itself. Some can try to get private assessment to get around the chronic underfunding, however, many cannot afford it or even access it.

This situation frequently shifts the focus toward safety rather than intellectual development, prioritizing tangible outcomes over providing the necessary support for a student’s learning. In such circumstances, teachers must do their utmost to support their students to the best of their ability.

What are some examples of tech that can support students in the classroom?

  • Speech to text.
  • Microphone for teachers to wear.
  • Subtitles on videos.
  • AAC devises, eye gaze systems.
  • Noise canceling headphones.
  • Translation devises.
  • Braile.
  • Hearing aids.
  • Audio recorders.
  • Sensory swing.
  • Lack of Access: Families may not have devices or reliable internet; schools may lack funding.
  • Lack of Support: Families or teachers may feel unprepared or overwhelmed.
  • Resistance to Change: Hesitation from stakeholders due to unfamiliarity or skepticism. (attitude, positive or negative, )
  • Privacy Concerns: Worries about data security.
  • Technology as a Distraction: Perceptions of misuse, including cell phone debates. (not being able to use phones as a need)
  • Advocate for funding, loaner programs, and grants.
  • Include assistive technlogy in IEPs.
  • Provide training for families and teachers, and ongoing support.
  • Use tools that promote independence and fit IEP goals. (explicitly state)
  • Ensure compliance with privacy laws.
  • Write assistive cell phone use into IEPs for clarity.
  • Normalize assistive tech and make accessible to all.

Getting accommodations happens better when it is coming from a higher up like the district or principal. Adaptions can be seen as a human right; you would not expect someone who wears glasses to take them off to take a test. Do not take away accommodations/tools/supports when the goal is achieved! (they may still want/rely on it as a back up).

How can teachers, parents, and schools work together to ensure technology becomes a bridge to opportunity rather than a barrier?

  • Open communication of its use
  • Speaking up/advocaing for students
  • Better training for EA’s on assistive tech
  • Learn from others; teachers/parents/etc (tools they have found useful; what has/has not worked and why).

Tricky situation; different family/cultural views; always be supportive and centre the child; best for the child, not imposing what you think onto them. Reserve judgement, you never know what they have been though – build trust. Only can do the best that you can with the tings you have been given and the things you have set up.

If we want to create inclusive classrooms we need to be able to address discrimination.

From the slides presentation

The Human Rights Code takes precedence over all laws. Educators must recognize that while autonomy is often centered on the curriculum, it does not override the needs of the students we teach. There are still many resources and practices rooted in racism and ableism. When concerns are raised by parents, it’s crucial not to react defensively. Instead, be receptive and approach the conversation with openness, empathy, and an effort to understand their perspective. Strive to become more aware of biases and prejudices, and remember—when we know better, we do better.

From the slides presentation
  • Is the student “disabled enough”? (can be physical or mental – must respect the expertise of an assessing/diagnosing expert – how are you too judge how disabled one is, you are not them).
  • Assuming the goal is to be independent of the use of technology
  • Negative perceptions from other students and adults

Normalize the use of tech in a classroom to both help students who need it and to combat the comment of “its not fair”; its not fair that they have to sit in a classroom where they cannot learn.

Where can you start to find out what students are going through and the kinds of support a student needs? – What do you have access to to find out needs of your class.

IEPs

  • Read it, no matter the date
  • Personalized document …
  • Outlines learning goals
  • Supports they require
  • Individualized!

do not want to be biased so do not read; no; take te time to read it – remove possible issues before they happen

competencey baised ieps – presume competence

Building Relationships

  • Ask family.
  • Ask student!
  • Ask other students if appropriate.
  • Ask teachers/collegues

Other tools in your toolbox

  • Movement breaks.
  • Peer support.
  • Leadership opportunities.
  • Play to strengths and interests.
  • Community of practice.
  • District and provincial resources.

How can you use technology to build an inclusive classroom environment?

  • Mutiple modes of engagement and expression.
  • Open conversations.
  • Not taking tech away (espesially when tool removed from disapline).

Connect with BCEdAccess

  • bcedaccess.com
  • info@bcedaccess.com
  • Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn @bcedaccess
  • If you have a child or youth with disabilities, join the private Facebook group – search BCEdAccess.

Other Resources

  • Menti.com – voting and participation and active engagement, follows along the slides.

Shared by: